Skip to main content

Help needed for eWON Cosy 131 NAT 1:1

Comments

14 comments

  • hms_support

    @Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    You should be able use the mapped WAN IP to communicate with the PLC on the eWON's LAN.

    Have you changed the advanced parameters for WANITPROT and FwrdToWAN?
    Those values need to be a value of 1 and 2 respectively as specified in the NAT 1:1 KB article.

    kb-0289-00-en-connect-to-devices-on-ewon-lan-from-computer-on-remote-site.pdf

     
     

    Also, is the mapped WAN IP reserved on the WAN network?

     

     

    0
  • Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Joe,

    I followed the steps outlined in the document including changing the advanced parameters you mentioned below. The mapped WAN IP address is reserved for our device, yes.

    Thanks,

    Julia

    0
  • hms_support

    @Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Have you ever configured the 2 rockwell devices to communicate successfully?

    "
    There's another option other than NAT 1:1.

    We could open up the WAN to LAN traffic completely which is typically not recommended because it allows you to access all your LAN devices from the WAN (less secure).

    In your case, it may be beneficial to try it out.

    We'll need to change up to 3 parameters in the eWON device.

    kb-0068-00-en-access-internet-via-cosy-beside-talk2m-vpn.pdf

     

     
     

    "¢ NatItf = 2 (Nat and TF on WAN)
    "¢ VPNRedirect = 0 (Allow traffic outside the VPN tunnel)
    "¢ FwrdToWAN = 1 (Forward LAN traffic to WAN)

    After changing the parameters, and re-booting your device. You'll have to ensure that your default gateway on your Rockwell PLC on the eWON's LAN is set to the eWON's LAN IP, and the default gateway of the Rockwell PLC on the WAN is set to the eWON's WAN IP.

     

     

    0
  • Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Joe,

    When the 2 Rockwell PLCs are on the same network, the messaging works fine. We would like to avoid opening the WAN to all LAN traffic. I was told that may cause IP conflicts as well as less security than is desired.

    Has the Cosy 131 device ever been successfully used to message between 2 PLCs like I am trying to do? They are RSLogix 5000 if that makes a difference.

    Thanks,

    Julia

    0
  • hms_support

    @Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Yes, this should work, NAT 1:1 should allow all traffic to be routed to that LAN device.

    WAN to LAN access should not cause IP conflicts if the WAN & LAN are in different subnets but it is definitely less secure.

    Which Rockwell PLCs are you using? Which industrial protocols are you trying to use?
    Which error are you receiving when trying to communicate?

    Additionally, if you can, please provide a backup of your eWON device (including support files).

    kb-0135-00-en-create-an-ewon-backup-through-ebuddy.pdf

     
     

     

     

    0
  • Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    We have a 1756-L61 (LAN) and a 1756-L63 (WAN). We just have a string and an integer in the L61 that we are trying to read the values of with a MSG instruction (CIP data table read) in the L63.

    I will provide you with the eWON backup tomorrow.

    Thanks,

    Julia

    0
  • Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Hi Joe,

    Attached is the backup file for our eWON.

    Thanks,

    Julia

    We have a 1756-L61 (LAN) and a 1756-L63 (WAN). We just have a string and an integer in the L61 that we are trying to read the values of with a MSG instruction (CIP data table read) in the L63.

    I will provide you with the eWON backup tomorrow.

    Thanks,

    Julia

    eWON_MatrixTech.tar (32.5 KB)

    0
  • hms_support

    @Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Thank you for uploading the backup.

    Just to confirm, the PLC's IP address is 172.16.25.106, and you are mapping it to a WAN IP 10.135.30.40?

    As a next step, I would ensure that the NATITF parameter is set to a value of 3 in your COMCFG, and update your eWON's FW version to 12.1s2, which will give us access to new logs in the device.

    https://websupport.ewon.biz/support/product/upgrade-ebuddy/upgrade-ebuddy

    0
  • Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Yes, the IP addresses you mentioned are correct.

    I have set the NATITF parameter to 3 and updated the firmware to version 12.1s2 and attached a new backup file.

    Thanks,

    Julia

    eWON_MatrixTech_v12-1s2.tar (35.5 KB)

    0
  • hms_support

    @Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Your device appears to be configured correctly for NAT 1:1.

    If the PLCs use some sort of broadcasting or low level exchange (ARP) then that may not pass through the NAT 1:1 but ethernet/IP traffic will definitely pass through.

    Which software are you using to communicate from PLC to PLC? Can you see your PLC in Rslinx?

    0
  • Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    I can see either PLC on RSLinx as long as my computer is on that subnet. We are trying to use a MSG instruction in RSLogix 5000; message type CIP Data Table Read routed through the Ethernet card (ENBT) and looking for the IP of our second PLC.

    0
  • Deryck Beliveau

    Hello @Julia_A_Foster_x_468,

    I am thinking that the CIP traffic might not work though the NAT 1:1 translation. Would you be able to take a wireshark showing the MSG instruction? Seeing a capture of the traffic hitting the WAN interface and the traffic going out the LAN should give us a better idea into what is going on here.

    Deryck

    0
  • chris_M

    Hi @Julia_A_Foster_x_468.

    Were you able to capture a wireshark log of the traffic or otherwise resolve the issue by another means?

    Regards,
    Chris

    0
  • Julia_A_Foster_x_468

    Hi Chris,

    We completed the research requested by the client and advised them based on our findings.

    Thanks,

    Julia

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.